Given that the National Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA authorized the use of COMINARTY vaccine for immunization against COVID-19 for children aged 5 to 11 years old, the Ministry of Health, through the Extraordinary Secretariat for Confronting COVID-19, opened a consultation public to civil society regarding such decision by the regulatory agent.
This public consultation will be available from December 23, 2021 to January 2, 2022, so that Brazilians can send duly substantiated contributions using the electronic form available at this address:
https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=00pVmiu1Ykijb4TYkeXHBUloERgyBRFJnwESj6y8rWNUOTRZSkRMSFNGSE9TWVVEWUlLQVJYQ1JaSiQlQCN0PWcu
on the Ministry of Health’s page. I present some suggestions of ADVANTAGES OF IMMUNIZATION OF SUCH AGE RANGE.
The survey encompasses 19 questions, plus one more, in which it asks if it has any contribution to the document attached to the public consultation. This document concludes that the vaccine is not compulsory in the Plan for this age group, prioritizing, however, children with comorbidities, then children living at home with a high risk of serious development of Covid-19, and children without comorbidities. A medical prescription and authorization from parents or guardians will always be required, upon signature of an assent term.
The first twelve questions are about the participant’s self-identification and the 13th. what was the medium that learned about the public consultation.
Now I will ask the remaining questions, with reasoning of my choice of option, based mainly on the video by Dr. Robert Malone released by Ana Paula Henkel on Pingo nos I, Jovem Pan program and other information disclosed on social networks. I explain that only the last question is necessary to justify.
14. Do you agree with non-compulsory vaccination in children aged 5 to 11, as proposed by the Ministry of Health?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: The immunization of children with an experimental vaccine, which has not reached the period of maturation, which according to the inventor of MRna messenger technology Dr. Robert Malone is at least 5 years, in which the technology has not been adequately tested, needing to understand the risks associated with new technology. Such analysis was not included in the Ministry of Health document and the risk is worse than the benefit.
15) Do you agree with the prioritization, in the National Immunization Program, of children aged 5 to 11 years with comorbidities considered at risk for severe COVID-19 and those with permanent disabilities to start vaccination?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: Even though the creator of the technology is in favor of vaccinating children with comorbidities, he warns that before injecting your child with a DECISION THAT IS IRREVERSIBLE, the following situation proven by scientific facts must be taken into account: the injected viral gene will produce in the your child’s body the toxic protein SPIKE, which causes damage to the brain, nervous system, heart, blood vessel, including blood clots, and the reproductive system and especially the immune system, which CANNOT BE REPAIRED. A fact that is triggering the emergence of VAIDS (vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) in those already vaccinated. If it warns of healthy children, imagine children with comorbidities.
16) Do you agree that the benefit of vaccination against COVID-19 for children aged 5 to 11 years should be analyzed, case by case, being important the presentation of the consent form of parents or guardians?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: There is no benefit of vaccinating children between 5 – 11 years old with COMINARTY from Pfizer, because according to Dr. Alessandro Loyola, the report of the Food and Drug Administration – FDA, federal agency of the US Department of Health, brings to for each death by Covid-19 avoided, 106 cases of periocarditis are predicted, reaching 179 cases in boys, which can be seen in Table 14, at the following website www.fda.gov/media/153447/download. Given this, what is the cost to public coffers to treat such a side effect of the vaccine and why place the responsibility solely on the children’s parents.
17) Do you agree that the benefit of vaccination against COVID-19 for children aged 5 to 11 years should be analyzed, case by case, being important that the prescription of the vaccine by pediatricians or physicians accompanying the children?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: According to Robert Malone there is no medical benefit from vaccinating healthy children aged 5 to 11 years. In view of this, the doctor/patient analysis as defended by the Federal Council of Medicine-CFM does not apply to this case of children and I would very much like to know the interest of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (SBI), of the Department of Infectology of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (SPB) and the Research Institute of the Hospital Einstein, which will not be responsible for the deaths of the children, but supported the authorization by ANVISA.
18) Do you agree that the presentation of the vaccination card is not mandatory for children to attend schools or commercial establishments?
(X) Yes
( ) No
Answer: The only sensible answer, which can be obtained from the Court with a Writ of Mandamus.
19. Do you have contributions about the document presented?
(X) Yes
( ) No
20. Comment:
Answer: What I would add is that there is no benefit as the document states, that the fatality rate of healthy children who contracted COVID-19 is very low, around 0.27%, according to Stanford University epidemiologist John Ioannidis in the range aged 0-19 years, while the document presents 0.05% for children aged 5 to 11 years. In addition, messenger RNA vaccine technology inventor Dr. Robert Malone strongly advises against vaccination in healthy children as it affects children’s organisms through the toxic protein SPIKE, specifically neurological, cardiac and immune system damage, which can cause the emergence of VAIDS (vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). Finally, Antonio Barra Torres, from the Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA speaks about the scientific community, but does not specify anyone, not to mention that this vaccine is not effective and safe for children aged 5 to 11 years. In view of this, the final decision rests solely and exclusively with the parents. And I’m against it.
Finally, I warn that the Ministry of Health’s website may present instability, but I urge social networks in the people of citizens to participate in the public consultation and fill the electronic box with our decision.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, I wish you all.
Luiz Antonio de Santa Ritta, for Agora News Brazil
Follow me on twitter! Let’s discuss the topic! @LuizRitta
Given that the National Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA authorized the use of COMINARTY vaccine for immunization against COVID-19 for children aged 5 to 11 years old, the Ministry of Health, through the Extraordinary Secretariat for Confronting COVID-19, opened a consultation public to civil society regarding such decision by the regulatory agent.
This public consultation will be available from December 23, 2021 to January 2, 2022, so that Brazilians can send duly substantiated contributions using the electronic form available at this address:
https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=00pVmiu1Ykijb4TYkeXHBUloERgyBRFJnwESj6y8rWNUOTRZSkRMSFNGSE9TWVVEWUlLQVJYQ1JaSiQlQCN0PWcu
on the Ministry of Health’s page. I present some suggestions of ADVANTAGES OF IMMUNIZATION OF SUCH AGE RANGE.
The survey encompasses 19 questions, plus one more, in which it asks if it has any contribution to the document attached to the public consultation. This document concludes that the vaccine is not compulsory in the Plan for this age group, prioritizing, however, children with comorbidities, then children living at home with a high risk of serious development of Covid-19, and children without comorbidities. A medical prescription and authorization from parents or guardians will always be required, upon signature of an assent term.
The first twelve questions are about the participant’s self-identification and the 13th. what was the medium that learned about the public consultation.
Now I will ask the remaining questions, with reasoning of my choice of option, based mainly on the video by Dr. Robert Malone released by Ana Paula Henkel on Pingo nos I, Jovem Pan program and other information disclosed on social networks. I explain that only the last question is necessary to justify.
14. Do you agree with non-compulsory vaccination in children aged 5 to 11, as proposed by the Ministry of Health?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: The immunization of children with an experimental vaccine, which has not reached the period of maturation, which according to the inventor of MRna messenger technology Dr. Robert Malone is at least 5 years, in which the technology has not been adequately tested, needing to understand the risks associated with new technology. Such analysis was not included in the Ministry of Health document and the risk is worse than the benefit.
15) Do you agree with the prioritization, in the National Immunization Program, of children aged 5 to 11 years with comorbidities considered at risk for severe COVID-19 and those with permanent disabilities to start vaccination?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: Even though the creator of the technology is in favor of vaccinating children with comorbidities, he warns that before injecting your child with a DECISION THAT IS IRREVERSIBLE, the following situation proven by scientific facts must be taken into account: the injected viral gene will produce in the your child’s body the toxic protein SPIKE, which causes damage to the brain, nervous system, heart, blood vessel, including blood clots, and the reproductive system and especially the immune system, which CANNOT BE REPAIRED. A fact that is triggering the emergence of VAIDS (vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) in those already vaccinated. If it warns of healthy children, imagine children with comorbidities.
16) Do you agree that the benefit of vaccination against COVID-19 for children aged 5 to 11 years should be analyzed, case by case, being important the presentation of the consent form of parents or guardians?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: There is no benefit of vaccinating children between 5 – 11 years old with COMINARTY from Pfizer, because according to Dr. Alessandro Loyola, the report of the Food and Drug Administration – FDA, federal agency of the US Department of Health, brings to for each death by Covid-19 avoided, 106 cases of periocarditis are predicted, reaching 179 cases in boys, which can be seen in Table 14, at the following website www.fda.gov/media/153447/download. Given this, what is the cost to public coffers to treat such a side effect of the vaccine and why place the responsibility solely on the children’s parents.
17) Do you agree that the benefit of vaccination against COVID-19 for children aged 5 to 11 years should be analyzed, case by case, being important that the prescription of the vaccine by pediatricians or physicians accompanying the children?
( ) Sim
(X) No
Answer: According to Robert Malone there is no medical benefit from vaccinating healthy children aged 5 to 11 years. In view of this, the doctor/patient analysis as defended by the Federal Council of Medicine-CFM does not apply to this case of children and I would very much like to know the interest of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (SBI), of the Department of Infectology of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (SPB) and the Research Institute of the Hospital Einstein, which will not be responsible for the deaths of the children, but supported the authorization by ANVISA.
18) Do you agree that the presentation of the vaccination card is not mandatory for children to attend schools or commercial establishments?
(X) Yes
( ) No
Answer: The only sensible answer, which can be obtained from the Court with a Writ of Mandamus.
19. Do you have contributions about the document presented?
(X) Yes
( ) No
20. Comment:
Answer: What I would add is that there is no benefit as the document states, that the fatality rate of healthy children who contracted COVID-19 is very low, around 0.27%, according to Stanford University epidemiologist John Ioannidis in the range aged 0-19 years, while the document presents 0.05% for children aged 5 to 11 years. In addition, messenger RNA vaccine technology inventor Dr. Robert Malone strongly advises against vaccination in healthy children as it affects children’s organisms through the toxic protein SPIKE, specifically neurological, cardiac and immune system damage, which can cause the emergence of VAIDS (vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). Finally, Antonio Barra Torres, from the Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA speaks about the scientific community, but does not specify anyone, not to mention that this vaccine is not effective and safe for children aged 5 to 11 years. In view of this, the final decision rests solely and exclusively with the parents. And I’m against it.
Finally, I warn that the Ministry of Health’s website may present instability, but I urge social networks in the people of citizens to participate in the public consultation and fill the electronic box with our decision.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, I wish you all.
Luiz Antonio de Santa Ritta, for Agora News Brazil
Follow me on twitter! Let’s discuss the topic! @LuizRitta
